Home > Latest Information
|
Black
Mesa Indigenous Support
P.O.
Box 23501, Flagstaff, Arizona 86002 Message Voice Mail: 928.773.8086 Email: blackmesais@riseup.net |
Edison is negotiating for a continued supply of coal from a mine on Indian land.
By Marc Lifsher LA Times Staff Writer 11.08.05
Southern California Edison Co. is close to reaching a deal with two
Indian tribes and the world's largest coal company that would bolster
the utility's effort to keep open a Nevada power plant that provides
cheap electricity to Southern California ? but is a major source of air
pollution.
Closed-door talks among Edison, the Hopi and Navajo tribes of northern
Arizona and mining giant Peabody Energy Corp. are aimed at resolving
water-use issues that threaten the future of Peabody's coal-mining
operations on Indian land, tribal leaders said. The Black Mesa mine is
the only source of coal for the giant Mohave power plant near Laughlin,
Nev., and is a vital pillar of the Hopi economy.
"Essentially, the parties are very near to some agreements" on how best
to share the region's scarce water supply and other issues related to
the mine, Hopi Chairman Wayne Taylor said.
Ensuring a steady supply of coal and water is crucial to Edison's
attempt to keep the 1,580-megawatt plant open despite a court-ordered
Jan. 1 deadline requiring the utility to either install costly
pollution-control equipment or shutter the 34-year-old generating
facility.
Edison declined to discuss details of the negotiations. "We are working
hard on all reasonable options that could make possible the continued
operation of the plant," the company said in a statement.
Environmentalists, who can veto any deal to keep the plant open, were
noncommittal Monday about Edison's efforts. They said the utility must
fulfill its obligations to cut pollution but said they were "open to a
viable proposal" that both cleans the air and boosts tribal economies.
To date, Edison has done little to significantly reduce emissions from
the plant since settling a lawsuit brought by environmental groups
under the U.S. Clean Air Act in 1999.
Until recently, Edison had told the California Public Utilities
Commission that it expected to close the Mohave plant at the end of
2005. That also signaled the end of the Black Mesa mine because its
only customer is the generating facility.
But on Sept. 26, Edison, a unit of Rosemead-based Edison International,
reversed itself, telling the commission that it wanted to keep the
plant open or shut it only temporarily.
One reason cited by the utility: Skyrocketing natural gas prices have
sharply increased the cost of operating more modern, gas-fired power
plants, making power produced by Mohave's coal-burning generators
cheaper by comparison.
Edison, which owns 56% of the plant, also noted that regulators were
concerned about the reliability of Southern California's supply of
electricity. The Mohave plant provides about 7% of the electricity used
by the utility's 13 million customers, many of them in Los Angeles,
Orange, Riverside and San Bernardino counties.
The remaining plant ownership is split among several utilities,
including the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power.
Edison has repeatedly told California regulators that it wouldn't spend
the $1 billion needed for pollution controls and other equipment at the
plant until it secured agreements from the Hopis, Navajos and Peabody
that would guarantee a long-term supply of coal and water that is
required.
Those commitments could be close at hand, Hopi leaders said. They are
backing a proposal that would allow Peabody to continue mining at Black
Mesa and would ensure a new source of water to carry the coal to the
power plant via a 270-mile slurry pipeline.
Edison and the tribal leaders then hope to persuade the environmental
groups to give them a waiver to operate the plant for at least three
years until the pollution equipment and pipeline improvements can be
completed, Hopi leaders said.
According to data gathered in 2002 and 2003 by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, the Mohave plant spewed an average of 19,000 tons of
nitrogen oxides, 40,000 tons of sulfur dioxides and 2,000 tons of fine
soot a year into the air above Laughlin, a Colorado River resort and
gambling town. Emissions from the plant also have contributed to
reduced visibility around the Grand Canyon to the east of the plant,
environmentalists said.
Environmentalists accuse Edison of sending mixed signals to the
Indians, California regulators and the plaintiffs who won the consent
decree. "They're playing a game of chicken up to the end of this
pending deadline," said Rob Smith of the Sierra Club in Phoenix.
Environmentalists remain frustrated at what they describe as Edison's
six years of foot-dragging, said Roger Clark of the Grand Canyon Trust
in Flagstaff, Ariz. Nevertheless, he said his group would be "happy to
listen" to any proposal from the utility.
"Our hope is that we can find a solution that not only cleans up the
pollution but also leaves the tribes in a much stronger economic
position in the future," he said.
Rob Hammond, Peabody's Southwest group executive, declined to comment
on the talks. Navajo leaders didn't return calls seeking comment.
Hopi leaders said they wanted to protect the environment but needed an
extension of the pollution-control deadline to make sure that tribal
economies weren't harmed by even the temporary loss of coal royalties
and, in the Navajo's case, hundreds of high-paying jobs at the Peabody
mine.
What's more, the development of a new source of water for the mine from
an underground aquifer about 100 miles south of the Peabody open pit
could be crucial to economic development of the 7,000-member Hopi tribe
and the 250,000-member Navajo Nation.
The Hopi, a tribe of farmers and artisans that has lived on the same
desert mesas for the last 1,000 years, has a 50% unemployment rate. A
shutdown at the mine would suck as much as 40% out of the $20-million
Hopi operating budget for 2006.
"This could be disastrous for the tribe," said Taylor, the chairman.
"We can be considered today as an endangered species."
The environmentalists are sympathetic but remain distrustful of Edison.
"We are unwilling to excuse further violations of the law," they told
the tribes in a May 25 letter signed by representatives of the Grand
Canyon Trust, the Sierra Club and the National Parks Conservation Assn.
Consumer advocates said that closing down the Mohave plant shouldn't
leave Edison short of power because the utility would open its new
gas-fired, 1,054-megawatt Mountainview power plant in Redlands early
next year.
And even if it's retrofitted, the plant at most can operate only 20
more years, said Bill Marcus, a consultant for the Utility Reform
Network, a San Francisco-based ratepayers' advocate. Edison's permit to
take water from the Colorado River to operate the generators expires in
2026, he said.
The best scenario would be for Edison to give up trying to keep Mohave
open and, instead, invest in alternative energy projects and
transmission lines that would help the Hopi and Navajo exploit their
potentially abundant wind and solar power resources, said Clark of the
Grand Canyon Trust.
"With California wanting to invest in cleaner forms of energy," he
said, "why buy another 20 years of inefficient, old coal-fired
generation?"